Search This Blog
Tuesday, March 9, 2021
Crisis of Society and State in Pakistan, by Intellectual Eqbal Ahmed
(25) Intellectual Dr. Eqbal Ahmed on:
Crisis of Society and State in Pakistan
A Talk by Intellectual Eqbal Ahmed
12-2-98
by Fazeel Azeez Chauhan
The Council On Pakistan
American Affairs (COPAA) has been holding gatherings to address important
issues of our community. A few days ago, they illuminated Southern California
with the presence of a great intellectual of our time, Professor Eqbal Ahmed,
PhD. The event was hosted by COPAA president Masrour Khan and Dr. Nazir Khwaja.
As evident in the pictures, several notable community activists were present
with their support, including Safi Qureshi, Siraj Bukhari, Counsel General
Tariq Khan, Ahmad and Parveen Ali, Rizwan-, Hamid- and Javida Malik, Hinna
Rizwi, Hussain Rokerya, Amir and Nuzi Sadiq, Arif Shah and Zakaria Sattar.
Also, to help the flood victims, Dr. Masrour Khan generously presented a check
of $5,000 to the Consulate of Bangladesh on behalf of COPAA.
Professor Eqbal Ahmed
currently resides in Pakistan and teaches in England. Palestinian scholar
Edward W. Said describes fascinating leaders in his book "Representations
of the Intellectual". An important trait of an intellectual is to
Speak The Truth To Power. Such people who don't sell out are very rare today.
They spend their lives struggling for the progress of humanity. Dr. Eqbal Ahmed
is such a recognized intellectual with a truly impressive record:
Mahatma Gandhi mentored
two Hindu and two Muslim children just before the time of partition. Gandhi
would give people the example of these four children and say "If these
children can manage to become friends and play together, then so can the
adults". One of these children was no other than Dr. Eqbal Ahmed. He came
to the U.S. at and early age and lived here for 37 years. He was a
distinguished teacher of History and Political Science at prestigious
universities like Princeton, for many years,. He was also: A revolutionary of
the Civil Rights Movement, An anti-Vietnam war activist, Editor of "Race
and Class" magazine and a Columnist for New York Times.
During Nixon's
presidency, Professor Eqbal Ahmed was charged with kidnapping of Henry
Kissinger and was defended by (former U.S. Attorney General and activist)
Ramsey Clark. Of course the charges were proven false. From 1959-1964, the
Professor was a part of the armed struggle for independence in Algeria. Two
documentaries have been made about his adventurous life. United Nations
Secretary General Cofy Annan said last week that "Dr. Eqbal Ahmed is a
public intellectual and a famous thinker whom we need to listen to and learn
from". He's trying to establish a quality university in Pakistan to be the
training ground for future leaders.
The following are
excerpts from Dr. Eqbal Ahmed's words which easily and clearly help us to
understand the situation: Since its inception, Pakistan has had a 9 part
crisis. These are not to be viewed separately and their solution is also
interlinked:
(1) Legitimacy: Meaning title to authority or
"Mulukiat". The public should feel that the state of affairs are what
they ought to be. The Chinese call it "The mandate of Heaven". It
should be a good state with not just power but also authority. Legitimacy of a
state comes from the subjects feeling that (a) It's a JUST state (b) Equality
is being observed including equality of opportunity, behavior and rights (c)
There is participation of the people (d) Ideology.
Quaid-e-Azam said
"You must now build a State in which a Muslim is not a Muslim and a Hindu
is not a Hindu". Meaning we need to work together to build the country and
get to a higher level. But a few years later, the 1956 Constitution made it the
"Islamic Republic" of Pakistan, stating that no laws shall be passed
which are (a) Repugnant to the Quran and Sunnah (b) The head of State shall be
a Muslim. Two years later, General Ayub Khan had a military coup de ta. One of
the greatest scholars of our time Maulana Fazlur Rahman was jailed. The
country's downfall escalated with Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, who shouted slogans
which were: Anti-American, anti-Indian, anti-Capitalism, anti-landlord and
"Roti, Kaprra aur Makaan". Then we lost East Pakistan by our own
mistakes.
Zia-ul-Haq's coup de ta
was next and he called himself "Islam ka sipahi". Over a period of 11
years, he promised 17 times that elections will be held in the next 90 days.
Our political jokes are second best in the world, after the Egyptians. The
Quaid said the base of a State is Justice and Democracy. But in the last 9
years, we've had a mish mash of systems. The 15th Amendment is one more brick
taken off the legitimacy of the State
(2) Democracy: 23 of the last 50 years have been military and
dictatorships. In the last 7 years, we've had four governments which are
unstable, squabbling and quite corrupt. There's a total absence of local
democracy. 90% of the time there is no Mayor. When there is a Mayor, he can't
do anything
(3) Development: The 5% rate is too high and there is a
labor intensive rate of growth. The country gets blood injections from the
outside like expatriates' money, borrowing and financial aid. Two times more is
spent on debt payment, than on defense. Rich classes, for example the landlords
have never taxed themselves. The working class is denied the fruits of their
labor
(4) Distribution: There is improper distribution of wealth
because 5% of people own 75% of the country's wealth. The other 95% of the
people have to live on the remaining 25%. Education is unequally distributed
with 15,000 kids studying abroad. Health is also unequal and not accessible to
working class people. There is inequality on Provincial lines with Punjab being
the richest and Balochistan being very poor
(5)
Integration: We've had consistent bad planning and bad
mistakes. People don't feel united as if it's their own country. The skewed
development and distribution which caused the breakup of Bangladesh still
continues. Kala Bagh Dam has aroused emotions needlessly. The anti-Shia Taliban
are a blight in the name of Islam and contribute to dividing Pakistan. Shias
are 20% of Pakistan and a majority in Iran
(6) State: The State is (a) Fat: and can't walk or
carry its own weight. It's obese beyond the capacity to operate optimally (b)
Over Centralized: For example the Prime Minister has to get involved in some
small tasks which subordinates should handle (c) Unresponsible: to the needs of
the people. Why should I pay taxes when the State is not serving its citizens
(7) Culture: There is no national culture. The country
is divided between people who speak English and those who don't, e.g. those who
go to Urdu-Medium schools. For example in Lahore, Mall Road is the dividing
line which separates posh areas like Gulberg and Model Town from the rest of
the people. The education system is helping to divide the country rather than
to integrate various classes
(8) Leadership: There's a consistent and permanent crisis
in leadership. There has been a growing failure of leadership since Jinnah and
Liaqat Ali Khan. More so since Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto
(9) Education: There's nearly a total destruction of
higher level educational institutions. There is no industry of Liberal Studies
which is supposed to build leaders in law, teaching, and the army, etc. Thus
there is no training ground for leaders. The top six colleges don't meet the
standards of even the worst community colleges of the U.S. Those who do get
educated are "freaks"
During the Question /
Answer session, Professor Eqbal Ahmed made many important points: It will take
a massive effort to turn the tide. India does not want to take over Pakistan.
We started and lost the war of 1965. India did not break up Pakistan from
Bangladesh, WE did it. Civil society must act as watch dog to give the lead to
the government. Public should be tough and give a hard time to the leaders.
Connect yourself to civil society and to people who are doing things. We
shouldn't pay taxes because the government can't even collect trash except in
Islamabad which is a wonderful place because it's only 10 minutes away from
Pakistan. It's an American suburb.
Human rights
organizations have discovered 22 private jails in Pakistan. Such tasks are the
responsibility of the government, which is not doing its job. Akhtar Hameed
Khan has one million people with him in Orangi. They have 85% literacy rate and
10% unemployment rate. Yet he was jailed, and mistreated, which caused him to
have a heart attack. About the nuclear explosions: There is no linkage between
testing and capability. Pakistan should not have done the nuclear testing. The
weak [Pakistan] doesn't show its weapons. It keeps its powder dry to keep the
other side guessing. We shouldn't try to match India's advances. Otherwise,
like Russia trying to keep up with America, we will implode and destroy
ourselves.
There is a shortage of
leaders in the world but Nelson Mandela is a good example of statesman-like
leadership. The Chinese are competent and effective. Clinton wasn't bad until
he unzipped his trousers. Fidel Castro is remarkable even as a survivor. Miss
Bhutto was a Kleptomaniac. Nawaz Sharif did some good work like keeping the
traffic moving and ending the overspending on weddings. A Prime Minister of
Pakistan has more power than a dictator. But Nawaz Sharif hungers for even more
power. This is his downfall and destroys his sense of purpose.
With the loss of East
Pakistan, the idea of Pakistan did not die. Ideas don't die, they change. The
loss should have taught us something. States or countries break down by
anarchy, revolution or defeat in war. Pakistan has the lowest literacy rate in
South Asia. The administration has to be cleaned up. People have to be
empowered by holding elections at the City level. There must be be a good
program of land reform. We must take risks and make sacrifices. Fear is always
the first obstacle. Achieving liberation is hard. it is like breaking rocks
with eggs. You need patience and intelligence. And don't feel defeated.
Letter to Chair of TV and Video Department of L.A.C.C. about Ethics and Responsibility in the Media
(21) Letter to TV Department
5-29-97
Dear Department Chair
for TV Students,
Los Angeles City College
TV and Video Production program
I am greatly concerned
that in the TV classes, the instructors hardly ever talk about Ethics or
responsibility. Media in general, and TV in particular are extremely powerful
tools. Any powerful tool can be misused. Students need to be made aware of the
propaganda, consumerism, "double-speak" and withholding of
information, which we see on TV. We should be given an opportunity to discuss
such issues in class and possibly come up with some ideas and solutions. This
will create a much richer educational experience. Here, I am not referring to
the moral issues of what my kid should watch on TV, nor about requiring rating
systems and computer chips to block out certain shows.
Since TV has a powerful
impact on its viewer, it has been misused throughout its history. In class, we
don't discuss the fact that people believe that what they see on TV is the
truth. Often people running for government offices make promises on TV. Later,
they do not keep these promises. Corporations spend millions of dollars to
promote a fantasy image about themselves through their commercials. Taking it a
level further, how about all the commercials which are trying to sell us the
latest cars, or the latest luxury items? From a psychological perspective, how
does this promotion of consumerism effect an ordinary person? Do these
commercials make people in Los Angeles, for example, feel like they are
superior human beings if they drive the newest car? Do these ads promote
classism?
How about, when some
story involving violence is shown on the news. If it's a bomb, it must be those
Arab.. terrorists? This is what they initially said about the Oklahoma Federal
building bombing. It is what they guessed about the bombing during the Olympics
in Georgia, and about the plane crash in New York. What about telling the
students how certain groups of people are subtly demonized, misrepresented and
stereotyped? Often we are not even aware of the hidden messages. The policemen
who brutally beat Rodney King, as seen on TV, were found not guilty, which sparked
"Riots" in "South Central" L.A. The students need to be
informed that the African American community and well informed people refer to
these incidents as "civil unrest". The news does not attempt to
educate people about the sociological aspects of violence. They are in the
business of sensationalizing an issue, which will attract attention, which will
sell more commercials, which will make more money for someone.
I mean, forget about us
as ordinary viewers....How about us as TV students, Are we supposed to just
ignore these issues and just roll the camera? Is it true that if a company has
enough money, they can say whatever they want to on TV? The Nazis used films to
promote their propaganda, and the viewers simply conformed. Is that what is
expected of us, the students, to not discuss in class, these important issues
that effect millions of people every day? Should we not be taught the truth
about the power and effects of TV? Should we not be taught to question what we
see on TV?
The ordinary person gets
his news and information through TV. It often does not portray minorities and
people of other cultures, in a positive light. How often are the villains shown
as some dark skinned, cynical, violent and crazy individuals. Sure, everyone is
supposed to have freedom of speech. But what about the freedom of information?
Shouldn't people (or students) be informed of the whole truth about TV? What
can we as viewers do to hold someone accountable for putting something on the
air? What can we as students, and future employees of this industry, do, to act
in a responsible and ethical manner? There is too much truth which is
eliminated or not mentioned. Should we as students take some kind of oath of
responsibility like doctors or court witnesses do? Or should we care about
nothing?
A Public Service Announcement Video about Muslims and Islam
(24) A Public Service Announcement Video:
Muslims and Islam
Background Music:
Mix of Nusrat Fateh Ali
Khan
Muslims are fun loving and
good people. There are One billion Muslim men, women and children all around
the world, who believe in the religion of Islam.
Muslims are often
stereotyped as terrorists and portrayed as villains in the media. Just like
other ethnic groups have been wrongfully stereotyped in the past, such as
Native Americans, Jews and African Americans. There is too much misinformation
about Muslims and Islam. But the truth is that Muslims are very peaceful and
loving human beings who, like many Americans, believe in Jesus, Moses and
Abraham as prophets of God.
Approximately one
American in a million commits a murder. But that doesn't mean that all
Americans are murderers. Similarly, about one in a million Muslims commits a
violent act on TV. But that does not mean that all Muslims are violent.
Ask yourself, could a
terrorist make something as romantic and as beautiful as the Taj Mahal? No way!
The truth is that the Muslim Emperor Shah Jahan made the Taj Mahal as a token
of his incredible love for his wife. And there are thousands of other
magnificent examples of Muslim architecture and art, all over the world.
Ask yourself, is Aladdin
a terrorist? His story is hundreds of years old and is taken from the Arabian
book called A Thousand And One Nights. It is the story of Allah-Deen and his
magic lamp.
Women are highly
respected in Muslim societies. Women have been elected as Prime Ministers in
Pakistan, Bangladesh and Turkey.
From the gas in your car
to the Arabic Numbers in Mathematics, Muslims continue to provide important contributions
to the Global community. Important sports figures like Mohammed Ali, Kareem
Abdul-Jabbar and Hakeem Alajuan represent good role models of Muslims.
We invite you to find
out the truth about Muslim people. The Quran and other books on Islam are
available at your local library or bookstore. For further information, you can
also contact the Islamic Society of Orange County by calling (714)531-1722
Let's cooperate and
create a truly Global Community. We can achieve that if we treat all human
beings with respect, no matter what color, gender or religion

